Well, civil justice fans, we would be remiss in not commenting on yesterday’s U.S. Supreme Court arguments in the nine-year, Homeric Odyssey of a case, Philip Morris USA v. Williams. Unfortunately, the size and scope of the story are such that it’s impossible to thoroughly discuss within the narrow confines of this humble blog without sounding, as Tom Cruise famously described Matt Lauer, “glib.”
Suffice it to say, as Williams’s attorney, Robert S. Peck of the Center for Constitutional Litigation (we’re big fans of Bob) pointed out: “This case involves a massive market directed fraud driven by high level decisions to deceive customers and knowingly endanger their health in order to generate enormous profits.” At issue are punitive damages awarded and upheld twice by the Oregon courts. The Supremes can’t seem to let it go! We hope the Court sides with Bob and his client. On the other hand this court has been judicially active beyond belief, so you never know.
We strongly encourage readers to follow the case closely (and we’ll do the same!) as the outcome could have far-reaching implications for punitive damage awards, which are a proven and essential tool in deterring corporate misconduct and protecting consumers.
Comments