Meanwhile, among the continuing coverage of the truly sick
prosecution of Texas nurses who have been “indicted and threatened with 10
years in prison” for reporting to state regulators that a doctor was practicing
unsafe medicine (we've been covering this since last year), we found an interesting comment from someone in the “tort reform” crowd who, after taking
an obligatory swipe at the nurses, said:
It’s possible that the nurses made false accusations maliciously, but that seems something that could be handled through civil suits and then only after the Texas Medical Board adjudicated the complaints. Such overreaching by doctors could backfire, as it would give credence to the proposition that medical malpractice lawsuits are a necessary check to incompetent doctors.
I guess when you’re right, you’re right.
UPDATE: The nurse has been acquitted!




Hmmm interesting. Well, since you brought it up before his body was even cold... Let's see, 1.) He had the surgery at Navy Med, a government-run facility or let me be clear: government-run healthcare and 2) try suing the government
Posted by: Political Girl | February 10, 2010 at 02:15 PM
Not sure your point. No one is proposing that the government run hospitals (not that this would be any worse than for-profit hospitals that cut safety corners). His family could still have a claim, but like most victims of medical malpractice, they rarely bring one. The point is that patient safety is a huge problem and making hospitals less accountable given this epidemic of medical negligence is the wrong way to go.
Posted by: Joe Consumer | February 10, 2010 at 02:28 PM